A trial over the version of redrawn in 2021is set to begin tomorrow in state district court.
The Republican Party and other plaintiffs argue Democratic lawmakers diluted GOP votes when they split the conservative southeastern corner of the state into three districts. Democrats argue redistricting is an inherently political process, but lawmakers acted appropriately in drawing a set of competitive districts.
The map鈥檚 first go around last year saw Democratic Rep. Gabe Vasquez eke out a win over incumbent Yvette Herrell in the 2nd Congressional District, which usually sends a Republican to Congress. The trial comes ahead of a likely rematch between the two in the 2024 election.
The district encompassed the entirety of southern New Mexico, including the oil-rich Permian Basin and vast agricultural land. It was to exclude a portion of the eastern border with Texas and add part of Albuquerque, including the heavily Hispanic and Democratic South Valley.
In January, sided with the Republicans in allowing the case to be heard in state district court.
It also determined that some political gerrymandering is acceptable under the state and U.S. constitutions. Attorney for the plaintiffs Daniel Gallegos argued New Mexico鈥檚 Democratic-controlled Legislature went beyond that 鈥� violating the state鈥檚 Equal Protection Clause.
鈥淥ur claim is excessive gerrymandering,鈥� he told the justices. 鈥淭hat this constitutes that egregious nature of gerrymandering.鈥�
Attorney for Democratic leadership Sara Sanchez argued the plaintiffs are pushing back on a district that is simply harder for Republicans to win than it used to be.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no constitutional right to the same political performance that your district was before,鈥� she said.
District Judge Fred Van Soelen will hear the case. He that the plaintiffs had a strong argument for the map diluting Republican votes, but allowed it to be used for the impending midterm elections.
The three-day trial is set to begin in the Fifth Judicial District Court Wednesday morning. The state Supreme Court has ordered Van Soelen to rule on the case no later than Oct. 6.
Support for this coverage comes from the
Thornburg Foundation and 91暗网 listeners.
