A new creates measures to support conservation, recreation and clean energy development on public lands. The rule could affect about 17% of New Mexico's land, which is overseen by the Bureau of Land Management.
But even as the rule's supporters celebrate, they are gearing up to defend it in court.
Advocates for conservation, recreation and wildlife told reporters Monday they were celebrating the rule, which changes the way land can be used on nearly 250 million acres nationwide.
The BLM already leases out land for uses like oil and gas extraction, and grazing. The new rule, among other things, creates leases for and designates some areas as being of critical environmental concern.
A restoration lease could enable a conservation group to restore wildlife habitat. A mitigation lease could, for instance, allow a company or organization that gets a permit for a renewable energy project to compensate for loss of habitat by restoring or enhancing habitat in a different area on public lands.
"It's a groundbreaking step toward leveling the playing field for conservation and tribal voices alongside other public land uses," said Keegan King, from the Pueblo of Acoma, the founder of the Native Land Institute advocacy group.
"This is crucial for maintaining ecosystem health in the face of climate change," he added, "especially for rural and tribal communities reliant on traditional practices, like farming, grazing and cultural site protection."
But some argue that the new policy violates the original mandate of the BLM to manage lands for multiple uses by prioritizing conservation. Some have threatened legal action, including the Western Energy Alliance whose president Kathleen Sgamma that the new rule is a "classic example of overreach by the Biden Administration".
鈥淭he added layers of red tape and federal bureaucracy embedded in the BLM鈥檚 Public Lands Rule create new roadblocks to conservation work. The health of Utah鈥檚 lands and wildlife will suffer as a result,鈥� said Utah's Governor Spencer Cox in a statement, adding that the state would challenge the rule in federal court.
"There are very likely to be legal challenges, possibly soon," said Chris Winter from the University of Colorado Law School. He thinks the challengers will have an uphill battle in court.
" that Congress gave to BLM in 1976 says 'manage for the long term sustainability of the environment, for wildlife habitat, for clean water, for recreation, for cultural values'," he said.
However, he added that federal environmental litigation is uncertain and said the BLM and the Department of Justice will likely have to defend the rule vigorously in the federal court system.
