An executive order issued in the early days of the Trump administration hit pause on at least $4 billion set aside to protect the flow of the Colorado River. The funds from the Inflation Reduction Act were offered to protect the flow of the water supply for about 40 million people and a massive agricultural economy. With the money on hold, Colorado River users are worried about the future of the dwindling water supply.
The river is shrinking due to The nation鈥檚 two largest reservoirs, Lake Mead and Lake Powell, created by dams on the Colorado River, have reached in recent years amid a megadrought spanning more than two decades. If water levels fall much lower, they could lose the ability to within the massive dams that hold them back, or even lose the ability to downstream.
The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act allowed Biden to $4 billion for Colorado River programs, funding , and Native American to conserve Colorado River water by leaving it in those reservoirs. The payments are compensation for l
A lot of the IRA money has already been delivered, but Bart Fisher, who sits on the board of the Palo Verde Irrigation District in California, is worried about what will happen .
鈥淚f there's no funding,鈥� he said, 鈥淭here will be no conservation.鈥�
Farmers in Palo Verde use Colorado River water to grow cattle feed and vegetables in the desert along the Arizona border. Fisher said they want to be in protecting the river, but they stand to lose money if they use less water and grow fewer crops.
鈥淵ou won't see any ag producer in any district willing to sacrifice revenue from their normal ag production for nothing,鈥� he said.
In the current funding cycle, landowners in Fisher鈥檚 irrigation district alone are getting about $40 million in exchange for cutting back on their water use. No one knows how much, if any, will be delivered in the next cycle, which starts in August. Fisher said farmers are already thinking about their budgets for the next growing season.
鈥淎t the moment, it's unnerving to think that maybe come August the first, all of our plans will need to suddenly change,鈥� he said.
When President Donald Trump signed his first executive order, it didn't seem to have a direct impact on how much water is in the Colorado River, at least in the short term.
The order, signed the first day Trump took office, aims to, 鈥渦nleash America鈥檚 affordable and reliable energy and natural resources,鈥� by ending 鈥渂urdensome and ideologically motivated regulations.鈥�
But the order also says, 鈥淎ll agencies shall immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.鈥�
鈥淭hese are not woke environmental programs,鈥� said Anne Castle, who held federal water policy roles during the Biden and Obama administrations. 鈥淭hese are essential to continued ability to divert water.鈥�
Water users whose grants have been paused said they are asking the federal government for more information and getting little in the way of answers. The federal agencies in charge of Western water did not respond to NPR鈥檚 requests for comment.
Conservation programs like the one sending money to California farmers have been key in boosting water supplies in major reservoirs. That is no small feat, as leaders of the states that use Colorado River water are caught in a legal standoff about how to share it going forward. They appear to be as they meet behind closed doors ahead of a 2026 deadline.
鈥淗aving this appropriated funding suddenly taken away undoes years and years of very careful collaboration among the states in the Colorado River Basin,鈥� Castle said . 鈥淎nd threatens the sustainability of the entire system.鈥�
In addition to those water conservation programs, the Inflation Reduction Act set aside hundreds of millions of dollars for projects aimed at keeping Colorado River tributaries clean and healthy. , small nonprofits, Native American tribes, and local governments were assigned federal money for a bevy of projects that included wildfire prevention and habitat restoration.
Sonja Chavez, general manager of the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, was expecting that money to make its way to her group for river improvement projects in Western Colorado.
鈥淚f there isn't some resolution to the freeze or some additional guidance on what's going to happen for folks,鈥� she said . 鈥淲e may have to put our entire programs on pause.鈥�
Smaller watershed groups and their projects to restore and improve small sections of rivers are uniquely dependent on money from the federal government.
鈥淔ederal funding is critical because that's the big money,鈥� said Holly Loff, a grant writer in Western Colorado and the former director of the Eagle River Watershed Council. 鈥淣o one can really compete with those big dollars, or very few other entities besides the federal government can fund at those levels.鈥�
Small groups dependent on that federal funding have been scrambling to come up with contingency plans since it has been paused, and some of their leaders say the gap would be difficult to fill with money from donors or local governments.
Loff said a continued pause on funding would cause a lot of financial pain for communities near the Colorado River 鈥� such as those with economies dependent on water-based recreation 鈥� and people far away, like those who buy grown with Colorado River water.
鈥淥ur economy is going to be impacted,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t's just far reaching. And I really can't think of how anyone can avoid being impacted.鈥�
This story is part of ongoing coverage of water in the West, produced by KUNC in Colorado and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. KUNC is solely responsible for its editorial coverage.
Copyright 2025 KUNC